205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 19.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-700.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.29%
Less SBC growth vs. ON's 37.75%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
17.19%
Less working capital growth vs. ON's 149.46%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.12%
AR is negative yoy while ON is 59.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-96.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -344.90%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
115.38%
AP growth well above ON's 188.04%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
38.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ON's 181.05%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
131.25%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -37.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.35%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 59.81%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-18.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -30.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.95%
Liquidation growth of 12.95% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-561.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 1400.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -19.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ON is 86.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-47.83%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 97.60%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.