PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 15.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Well above ON's 85.24% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-28.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -19.23%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
140.76%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -105.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
19.70%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ON's 93.99%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
137.50%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -308.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
291.67%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -9.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
205.85%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -51.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-110.00%
Negative yoy while ON is 8.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
87.79%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -1.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -34.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Acquisition growth of 23.18% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -126.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-6000.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -10.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while ON is negative at -60.51%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-9.52%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.