205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -73.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.23%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -2.84%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-119.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 101.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.56%
SBC growth well above ON's 7.60%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -79.47%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -464.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-97.96%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -3.53%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-172.86%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 405.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-118.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -129.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-282.14%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -49.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-42.35%
Negative yoy CFO while ON is 0.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
18.18%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ON's 38.89%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
31.31%
Purchases growth of 31.31% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
84.18%
Liquidation growth of 84.18% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
98.32%
We have some outflow growth while ON is negative at -81.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
129.62%
Investing outflow well above ON's 38.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x ON's 67.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
9.88%
We slightly raise equity while ON is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-23.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -506.45%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.