PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x ON's 6.91%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
4.29%
D&A growth well above ON's 1.27%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 2.80%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-37.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -22.51%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
94.19%
Well above ON's 85.05% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
64.95%
AR growth while ON is negative at -784.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
55.17%
Inventory growth well above ON's 82.22%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
750.00%
AP growth well above ON's 35.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
1.97%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ON's 195.72%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
95.24%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -16.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.33%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 33.41%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-48.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 21.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
48.59%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. ON's 101.77%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-155.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.73%
Liquidation growth of 24.73% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-58.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -97.17%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2082.72%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 47.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ON's 20.83%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-46.08%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-17.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -87.50%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.