205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ON at -0.66%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.47%
Less D&A growth vs. ON's 7.16%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
55.77%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -129.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-8.70%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 5.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
104.98%
Less working capital growth vs. ON's 578.95%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
1211.76%
AR growth well above ON's 267.10%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-288.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -345.54%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-125.49%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 1375.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
13.87%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -23.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1150.00%
Well above ON's 53.66%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
1.85%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 17.53%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
12.70%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -3.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -346.67%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
89.25%
Purchases growth of 89.25% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
26.12%
Liquidation growth of 26.12% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
15.36%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. ON's 12066.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
185.12%
Investing outflow well above ON's 22.32%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-67.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -167.07%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.