205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ON at -31.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.61%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -0.29%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
117.39%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. ON's 371.03%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
45.24%
SBC growth well above ON's 4.23%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-174.23%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -333.52%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-161.64%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -126.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
185.15%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -119.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-415.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with ON at -330.59%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-169.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -81.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
19.05%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -74.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-48.39%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -67.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.29%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -32.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
55.26%
Purchases growth of 55.26% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-26.77%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
96.62%
We have some outflow growth while ON is negative at -127.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-22.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -78.53%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-48.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ON is 34.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
297.37%
Issuance growth of 297.37% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
42.66%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of ON's 62.56%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.