PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -158.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.00%
D&A growth well above ON's 5.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-112.90%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-28.36%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -46.15%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
24.31%
Less working capital growth vs. ON's 287.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
266.67%
AR growth while ON is negative at -118.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-25.00%
Negative yoy inventory while ON is 954.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
211.54%
AP growth well above ON's 138.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-40.30%
Negative yoy usage while ON is 287.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
141.82%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -3.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
10.91%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 8.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
47.54%
CapEx growth well above ON's 54.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-47.54%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 97.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-312.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.00%
Liquidation growth of 10.00% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
32.42%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. ON's 100.01%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-254.26%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 88.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
Issuance growth of 32.88% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
47.16%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of ON's 74.02%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.