PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.91%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 194.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.09%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 7.07%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1350.00%
Well above ON's 101.86% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-14.58%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.22%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -216.18%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
248.05%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ON's 523.08%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with ON at -115.97%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
8.75%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -279.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-195.65%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -12.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-11.95%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -62.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-9.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -0.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
9.40%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. ON's 100.95%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-109.94%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
38.64%
Liquidation growth of 38.64% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-5.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 4900.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-110.18%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 19.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.26%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-7.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 85.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.