PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -124.08%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
53.66%
SBC growth while ON is negative at -11.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-247.40%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ON is 104.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-190.30%
AR is negative yoy while ON is 379.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-105.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -337.80%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
303.45%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -552.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-505.75%
Negative yoy usage while ON is 92.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-190.91%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -13.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-51.48%
Negative yoy CFO while ON is 81.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.23%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -17.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 10650.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Purchases growth of 68.79% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
437.05%
Liquidation growth of 437.05% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
96.79%
We have some outflow growth while ON is negative at -56.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
143.00%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -1.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
0.13%
We repay more while ON is negative at -286.21%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
204.17%
We slightly raise equity while ON is negative at -71.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-235.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -3342.11%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.