PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 18011.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.40%
Less D&A growth vs. ON's 1.49%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -2.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-630.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -42.34%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-254.29%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -297.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
148.12%
Inventory growth well above ON's 98.13%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-117.81%
Both negative yoy AP, with ON at -92.52%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
40.91%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ON's 92.71%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
100.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ON's 480.11%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-16.10%
Negative yoy CFO while ON is 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-12.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 17.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
12.31%
Acquisition growth of 12.31% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-920.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-71.82%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-28.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 166.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-252.33%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 20.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while ON is negative at -27906.98%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
41.38%
Issuance growth of 41.38% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
98.30%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ON's 16.67%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.