205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -44.29%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.80%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ON at -1.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
56.86%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. ON's 126.06%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-16.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -5.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
238.74%
Well above ON's 259.33% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
89.81%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ON's 189.21%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
82.81%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ON's 4400.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
123.08%
Lower AP growth vs. ON's 2700.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
742.31%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -2000.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-384.38%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -110.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
47.26%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 145.04%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-45.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -251.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
45.21%
Acquisition growth of 45.21% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
7.44%
Purchases growth of 7.44% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
211.18%
Liquidation growth of 211.18% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-45.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 995.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.50%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -257.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.