205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 68.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -2.09%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
1300.00%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -21.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -21.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
336.76%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -228.66%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-785.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -398.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-132.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -56.52%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
305.88%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -127.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
339.29%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -210.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
108.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ON's 1200.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
14.47%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -8.01%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-25.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -4.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
25.91%
Some acquisitions while ON is negative at -46.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
13.27%
Purchases growth of 13.27% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-46.44%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -740.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-796.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -48.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
Stock issuance far above ON's 8.77%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
4.79%
Buyback growth below 50% of ON's 37.14%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.