205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ON at -19.60%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -3.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -159.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
55.88%
SBC growth well above ON's 7.49%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-227.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ON is 25.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-38.62%
AR is negative yoy while ON is 123.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
7.69%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -32.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-670.00%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 104.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-261.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -50.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1650.00%
Negative yoy while ON is 4541.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-47.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -18.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-8.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -51.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
6500.00%
Acquisition spending well above ON's 100.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-89.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-22.87%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -128.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-970.42%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 38.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ON is 99.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
Issuance growth of 44.44% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
95.38%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 66.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.