PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -25.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.25%
D&A growth well above ON's 3.03%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-19.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 42.59%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.43%
SBC growth while ON is negative at -2.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
108.15%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -65.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-134.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -134.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
72.62%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -117.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
232.47%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -1533.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
96.78%
Growth well above ON's 76.34%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
102.42%
Well above ON's 47.80%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
54.47%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -27.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ON's 39.68%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Purchases growth of 56.87% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.97%
Liquidation growth of 18.97% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.00%
We have some outflow growth while ON is negative at -28993.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -151.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
89.93%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ON's 44.44%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
281.54%
We slightly raise equity while ON is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-2266.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -50.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.