205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.39%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.44%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -7.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
42.53%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -35.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 1.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
100.69%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
47.52%
AR growth while ON is negative at -44.36%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
21.88%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -4.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
176.03%
Lower AP growth vs. ON's 2807.14%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
137.09%
Growth well above ON's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
318.64%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -117.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
119.08%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -69.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -20.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 72.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-206.54%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 43.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-2.54%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.75%
We have some buyback growth while ON is negative at -0.73%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.