PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.73 | 5.46
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -11.57%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.44%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -8.94%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
42.53%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -7.51%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
100.69%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
47.52%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -142.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
21.88%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -18.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
176.03%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -1081.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
137.09%
Growth well above QCOM's 130.98%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
318.64%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -1483.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
119.08%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -44.32%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 22.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -147.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -128.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-206.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -92.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-2.54%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.75%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.11%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.