PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-294.74%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
238.20%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -101.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.27%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 39.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-36.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -66.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
118.75%
Liquidation growth of 118.75% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
50.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 746.05%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-34.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -136.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Issuance growth of 466.67% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.