PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
406.28%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -16.21%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-338.96%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 80.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-13.35%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 191.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.95%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -73.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.67%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -5.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
458.18%
Liquidation growth of 458.18% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-135.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -100.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-220.05%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 45.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QCOM's 101.86%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.