PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.28%
Net income growth similar to QCOM's 21.58%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-106.81%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -102.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-48.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -187.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-89.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 27.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
67.16%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -222.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
83.92%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -66.22%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Growth well above QCOM's 92.77%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
133.55%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 73.93%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -51.92%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-103.49%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.