PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-43.71%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -22.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-184.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -2271.54%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
40.78%
AR growth of 40.78% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-1950.00%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 96.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.32%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -395.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
108.83%
Well above QCOM's 103.23%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-23.75%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -5.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-7.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 62.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.41%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 76.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-36.40%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -98.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2323.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -214.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -56.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-3.03%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.