PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.06%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -10.36%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Well above QCOM's 48.43% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -448.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above QCOM's 55.90%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-107.78%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 338.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
34.22%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -1.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-63.53%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 31.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.10%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -69.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
5.39%
Below 50% of QCOM's 1267.10%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-32.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -181.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
26.41%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 18.25%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.42%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 50.30%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
35.29%
Buyback growth of 35.29% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.