PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-185.65%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 141.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.42%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -4.92%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.46%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -17.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.63%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 60.92%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.45%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -47.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
138.10%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -99.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
392.44%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -53.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
62.00%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 31.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.35%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
16.62%
Below 50% of QCOM's 72.34%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.91%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 176.06%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -54.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-2057.14%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.