PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.69%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -33.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
8.51%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 1.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
245.45%
Deferred tax of 245.45% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.93%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 135.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.13%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 181.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.16%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 106.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
171.66%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -12.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
133.53%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 5617.71%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
24.36%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 56.59%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 72.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
19.15%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -35.61%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.71%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 145.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -38.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
44.08%
Buyback growth of 44.08% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.