PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
350.00%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -68.45%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.41%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 15.72%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-152.94%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 64.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-205.88%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -30.48%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.73%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 82.12%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
115.79%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 2631.45%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
30.74%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -32.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-47.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -18.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.20%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -362.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
35.70%
At 50-75% of QCOM's 67.20%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.90%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -134.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.33%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 98.97%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-138.10%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.