PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
97.89%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -131.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.24%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 8.12%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-1011.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.25%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -2698.83%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.23%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -114.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.96%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -1080.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
119.51%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. QCOM's 258.24%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
45.99%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -61.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-51.98%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 10.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.58%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 30.59%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
9.52%
Below 50% of QCOM's 51.99%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 733.38%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
128.85%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 75.04%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.18%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 45.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
93.00%
Buyback growth of 93.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.