205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
134.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 26.83%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-12.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -60.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-112.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-262.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -358.65%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.79%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -110.13%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -132.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-88.30%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 203.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-73.66%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -26.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
44.07%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -145.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -31.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
318.88%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 15.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.42%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 49.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.23%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 234.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
33.33%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.