PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.42%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -57.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.87%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 7.35%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
46.15%
Deferred tax of 46.15% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.32%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 181.89%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth well above QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-28.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -107.68%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth well above QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
237.84%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 810.73%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-219.05%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 17.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
92.86%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 75.15%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-22.73%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 39.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 19.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-18.70%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 35.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8900.00%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 14.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
193.75%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 14.47%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-27.08%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.