205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
258.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 52.02%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.36%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 9.48%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
320.25%
Deferred tax of 320.25% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.58%
Well above QCOM's 305.20% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.00%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -56.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.86%
Growth well above QCOM's 205.21%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-214.71%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -99.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
109.22%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 52.84%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-17.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.10%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -21.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
13.91%
Below 50% of QCOM's 84.99%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
82.81%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -112.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.32%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 35.77%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.94%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 357.78%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-91.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.