PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.66%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -2.62%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.14%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 27.15%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-51.76%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.95%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -309.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.18%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 8.56%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.54%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -276.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-460.00%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
86.17%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -43.91%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
7.30%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -41.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.49%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -26.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-19.42%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 64.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.65%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 41.79%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -39.34%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
13.27%
Buyback growth of 13.27% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.