205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.97%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -20.49%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.05%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 6.16%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1342.86%
Well above QCOM's 284.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.85%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -254.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
476.74%
Growth well above QCOM's 313.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
464.29%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -158.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.54%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 75.66%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
36.06%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -82.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.93%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -6.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
1.24%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -44.74%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.01%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -308.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-277.55%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.