205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.12%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 32.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-10.84%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 5.49%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
9.76%
Deferred tax of 9.76% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-162.36%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -163.73%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.00%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 95.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-196.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -129.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-96.08%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 231.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-59.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -48.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-31.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -35.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.62%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 28.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
34.53%
At 75-90% of QCOM's 42.07%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
625.00%
Growth well above QCOM's 98.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
727.78%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 64.07%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -28.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-303.51%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.