PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.69%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 15.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-34.71%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
61.29%
Deferred tax of 61.29% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -187.21%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.43%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -280.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -176.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
23.08%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -17.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-38.66%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -36.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-17.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -54.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-17600.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 97.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
57.02%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
23.51%
At 50-75% of QCOM's 34.58%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.54%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -458.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-65.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.