PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -4.35%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.58%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 8.62%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-13.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-34.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 197.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth well above QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-56.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -16.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-804.76%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 333.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2998.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -57.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 49.16%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
8.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 24.41%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
84.18%
Acquisition spending well above QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-165.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 17.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-15.46%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 5.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
49700.00%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -5675.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
146.91%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 38.46%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
11.58%
Debt repayment growth of 11.58% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.52%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 58.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
27.99%
Buyback growth of 27.99% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.