205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.71%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -4.51%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.51%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 18.84%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-67.39%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.78%
Well above QCOM's 185.25% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.62%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 123.81%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.14%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 752.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-617.65%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 16.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
101.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 16.67%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
22.46%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 29.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.40%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. QCOM's 25.75%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-41.55%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -11.69%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.00%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 81.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -48.39%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
33.33%
Buyback growth of 33.33% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.