PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x QCOM's 11.88%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.03%
Less D&A growth vs. QCOM's 2.20%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
70.93%
Well above QCOM's 123.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-153.57%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 79.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
60.21%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -28.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
686.67%
Well above QCOM's 75.27%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
62.09%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 25.60%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
2.79%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 71.43%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above QCOM's 96.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-74.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -14.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
51.73%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -21.63%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-188.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -143.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 62.89%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
13.42%
Buyback growth below 50% of QCOM's 58.33%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.