205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.71%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 41.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-36.15%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-88.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.31%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 372.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.12%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -77.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.60%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
1215.38%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -237.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.05%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-19.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -57.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1300.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -109.69%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
58.67%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -9.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
50.15%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -8.64%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 47.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
259.57%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -76.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -54.79%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-33.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -851.56%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.