PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1429.41%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -184.75%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.92%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-6.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
80.61%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -60.11%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
46.79%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -96.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-86.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -26.15%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth well above QCOM's 146.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
250.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 635.04%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 189.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
121.91%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -63.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-11.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
50.96%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -85.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-55.86%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 33.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-19.81%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -12.38%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.88%
We reduce yoy invests while QCOM stands at 32.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
5.56%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QCOM's 188.46%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-147.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.