205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.46%
Net income growth under 50% of QCOM's 4.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.45%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -7.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-116.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.30%
SBC growth while QCOM is negative at -74.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1385.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -73.72%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-260.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -77.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
13.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QCOM's 236.49%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.86%
Growth well above QCOM's 10.30%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 106.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-29.07%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -6.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
49.77%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 38.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.02%
Purchases well above QCOM's 46.83%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
24.03%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 21.16%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.17%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 92.92%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -58.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-43.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.