205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.66%
Net income growth at 75-90% of QCOM's 12.78%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
6.25%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 3.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-429.63%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.31%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 111.11%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
917.24%
AR growth well above QCOM's 157.94%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-37.88%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -93.33%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with QCOM at -907.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-633.33%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -65.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.68%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 14.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.99%
Lower CapEx growth vs. QCOM's 196.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-137.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 7023.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -11.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
12.63%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -0.84%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.22%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 127.59%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
600.00%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 385.71%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.