PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 35.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.94%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 17.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
121.68%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -1008.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
21.28%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 9.43%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-268.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 2750.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-118.57%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-73.63%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 48.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-239.39%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 456.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -876.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-58.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -95.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.55%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -190.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -105.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-24.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 19.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
153.36%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -2.04%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 111.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. QCOM's 252.87%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.95%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. QCOM's 365.29%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-28.50%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.