PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-50.42%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 1.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
46.90%
D&A growth well above QCOM's 30.27%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1933.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 8088.89%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-29.03%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 32.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
98.12%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 340.74%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
972.73%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -7950.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
822.73%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -150.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.54%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 372.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-3600.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -5544.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.67%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 43.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
20.73%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 11.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -30.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-76.77%
Both yoy lines are negative, with QCOM at -65.79%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
100.00%
Growth well above QCOM's 170.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
78.76%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 0.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
83.33%
Debt repayment growth of 83.33% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
284.85%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -30.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
33.33%
Buyback growth of 33.33% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.