PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.30%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 57.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-0.61%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 1.44%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
625.00%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -3965.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.25%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -2.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-10.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 422.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-339.68%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -313.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
64.84%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -242.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-251.35%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 903.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.86%
Growth well above QCOM's 280.91%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.33%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 6.13%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-41.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 23.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above QCOM's 90.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-70.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -74.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
43.18%
Similar to QCOM's 39.52%. Walter Schloss finds parallel timing in investment disposals or maturities.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 46600.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
18.89%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 27.22%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-91.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-73.75%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 297.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.