PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.78%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -45.29%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Well above QCOM's 63.58% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-221.88%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 9.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
110.78%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -278.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
111.92%
AR growth well above QCOM's 65.61%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
215.63%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 54.93%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
3.85%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -134.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
17.28%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -219.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-48.98%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 30.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
78.07%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -51.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-2.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -44.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-257.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while QCOM stands at 1.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-78.12%
We reduce yoy sales while QCOM is 17.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-548.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -119.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
13.04%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -191.39%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-7.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -75.41%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.