PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.33%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 4.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.06%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 16.29%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-160.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 142.62%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
182.05%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 7.20%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
2892.00%
Well above QCOM's 0.24% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
2016.67%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -283.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
145.95%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -521.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
277.60%
AP growth well above QCOM's 293.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-43.16%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 24.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1044.00%
Both negative yoy, with QCOM at -1161.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.73%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 52.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
36.00%
CapEx growth well above QCOM's 37.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.46%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -0.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
194.30%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 103.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.88%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 99.94%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -34.32%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
111.11%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 59.64%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.