PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.32%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -2.10%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.24%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 2.90%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-460.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.08%
Less working capital growth vs. QCOM's 97.59%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-42.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -29.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-135.09%
Negative yoy inventory while QCOM is 16.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
85.25%
A yoy AP increase while QCOM is negative at -99.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
9.62%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QCOM's 197.96%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-50.00%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 22.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
87.22%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x QCOM's 12.20%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-15.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -40.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-248.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -17.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
264.42%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -11.38%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-638.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 69.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
1309.09%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -99.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.45%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 19.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-6.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.