205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Net income growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 62.03%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 6.25%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-54.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QCOM at -11.35%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
34.11%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -199.01%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-10.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -212.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-276.47%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -135.44%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
49.57%
Lower AP growth vs. QCOM's 223.65%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
99.28%
Growth well above QCOM's 176.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
81.82%
Some yoy increase while QCOM is negative at -176.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.75%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -34.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -179.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -139.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
64.84%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 54.23%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
-302.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -102.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
362.95%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -752.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-55.83%
Negative yoy issuance while QCOM is 16.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while QCOM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.