PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Negative net income growth while QCOM stands at 4.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.95%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -3.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-95.65%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
30.00%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 7.91%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-265.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 92.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-169.06%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 153.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-81.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -11.81%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-460.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -10.07%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-400.00%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 51.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
96.35%
Well above QCOM's 42.93%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-52.12%
Negative yoy CFO while QCOM is 46.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.60%
Some CapEx rise while QCOM is negative at -10.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 77.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
64.25%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -80.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
29.47%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 20.41%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
103.45%
Growth well above QCOM's 125.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
132.18%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -1895.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
75.71%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -60.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.01%
We have some buyback growth while QCOM is negative at -39.25%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.