PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 12.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-2.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with QCOM at -2.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
12.28%
Well above QCOM's 7.50% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-21.43%
Negative yoy SBC while QCOM is 8.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
231.82%
Well above QCOM's 108.58% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QCOM at -39.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
378.05%
Inventory growth well above QCOM's 381.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while QCOM is 66.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Growth well above QCOM's 104.89%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 325.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.83%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QCOM's 421.58%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-11.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -86.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
11.20%
Some acquisitions while QCOM is negative at -62.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
50.05%
Some yoy expansion while QCOM is negative at -47.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
13.95%
We have some liquidation growth while QCOM is negative at -20.21%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-14.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while QCOM is 152.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
323.56%
We have mild expansions while QCOM is negative at -246.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -65.87%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-31.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -48.84%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-20.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -177.61%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.