PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Some net income increase while QCOM is negative at -22.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.81%
Negative yoy D&A while QCOM is 2.20%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QCOM stands at 16.50%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.56%
SBC growth of 5.56% while QCOM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
101.29%
Slight usage while QCOM is negative at -197.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.00%
AR growth while QCOM is negative at -160.68%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
37.72%
Some inventory rise while QCOM is negative at -172.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
137.50%
AP growth well above QCOM's 74.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
177.03%
Some yoy usage while QCOM is negative at -546.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-60.32%
Negative yoy while QCOM is 132.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.71%
Some CFO growth while QCOM is negative at -73.09%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 2.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -4.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
34.44%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x QCOM's 4.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-4966.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -78.66%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-88.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -0.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
Stock issuance far above QCOM's 73.74%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
16.35%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of QCOM's 24.49%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.