PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QCOM at -57.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.32%
Some D&A expansion while QCOM is negative at -2.08%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
121.43%
Some yoy growth while QCOM is negative at -413.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
41.67%
SBC growth well above QCOM's 12.21%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QCOM is 447.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-140.96%
AR is negative yoy while QCOM is 148.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-394.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QCOM at -62.39%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-232.20%
Both negative yoy AP, with QCOM at -174.82%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-996.77%
Negative yoy usage while QCOM is 396.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
80.84%
Well above QCOM's 59.26%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-42.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QCOM at -33.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while QCOM is 14.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QCOM stands at 61.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.17%
Purchases well above QCOM's 18.56%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
46.41%
At 50-75% of QCOM's 68.77%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
126.27%
We have some outflow growth while QCOM is negative at -15991.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.98%
Investing outflow well above QCOM's 154.09%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
75.00%
We repay more while QCOM is negative at -17.80%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1441.67%
We slightly raise equity while QCOM is negative at -46.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-15.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with QCOM at -97.33%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.